Advertisement
“General Secretary in-charge can be appointed,” senior AIADMK leader Panruti Ramachandran asserted, stating that Sasikala’s elevation was in compliance with party rules and that it was valid. “The constitutional obligation of the Governor is to swear in Sasikala. There is no ground for stopping it. Nobody can stop it,” Ramachandran, who was a minister in the first MGR cabinet, said. Asked about a PIL opposing swearing in of Sasikala as chief minister, he said the court can dismiss the petition, saying it cannot interfere in the governor’s duty. “We decided on Sunday (to elect her as legislature party leader). The petition came to Supreme Court on Monday”.
The press conference at the party headuqarters was called to dispel rumours and wrong stories circulating about Jayalalithaa’s death especially in the wake of media interaction of Pandian and his son, who was also a minister in Jayalalithaa’s cabinet. Pandian and his son Manoj had earlier alleged that Sasikala’s elevation was against party norms. Sengottaiyan, who was appointed organisation Secretary on Friday, said despite Pandian’s five family members being given party positions years ago which could not be seen in any other party, he has joined “detractors and was causing confusion.”
He said AIADMK is a “fort” which cannot be shaken by such people. To a question on Sasikala soon becoming Chief Minister and if there was any delay from the side of theCentre in swearing her in, Ramachandran said “he (Governor Rao) will tell when he will come. “He has accepted the resignation of Panneerselvam, it is a question of convenience of Governor,” he said, adding, he did not see the Centre delaying it.
Related Articles
Advertisement
Blaming Pandian for notmaking efforts to unify the party in 1990 after it had split following the death of MG Ramachandran, Sengottaiyan said he did not do anything for the party then. “What right has he got to talk now,?” he asked and alleged that he was also responsible for filing some cases against Jayalalithaa including the one against providing high-level security.
Reacting to Pandian’s charges, AIADMK spokesperson C R Saraswathi alleged that he wanted to split the party. “Why is he creating a scene now? What was he doing during those 60 days (since Jayalalithaa’s death)?” she asked. Saraswati alleged that in 1989, two years after the death of MG Ramachandran, he opposed “Amma” and stood by Janaki Ramchandran (MGR’s widow). “Claims (are) being made to create confusion now… he could have approached the party forum,” she said.