Advertisement
Sprinklr filed an affidavit in this regard in the High Court on May 18, prior to the state government informing the court that the US-based company will have no role in analysing the data of COVID-19 patients in the state.
In its affidavit, the company has said it had received a letter from the state government on May 16 directing it to delete all back-up data received by it prior to the High Court’s interim order of April 24.
“The respondent company (Sprinklr) hereby confirms and declares that pursuant to the instructions under Government of Kerala’s letter dated May 16, the respondent company has permanently deleted all such backup data, and no data whatsoever, received by the respondent company from the Government of Kerala, prior to order dated April 24, 2020, remain with the company,” it has said in the affidavit filed in response to a petition seeking quashing of the state government’s contract with Sprinklr.
Related Articles
Advertisement
On April 24, the High Court had restrained the US- based IT firm from analysing or processing the data related to COVID-19 patients and directed it to retransfer to the state government, any data it has obtained.
In an interim order on a plea seeking to quash the state government’s contract with Sprinklr, the High Court had also directed the state government to anonymise all data of COVID-19 patients collected by it and allow the IT firm to access data only after completing the anonymization process.
The state government had entered into a contract with the IT company based out of the US, owned by a non-resident Keralite, wherein the data of suspected and actual patients of the COVID-19 virus will be collected using government machinery and is uploaded to the foreign firm’s web server on a daily basis.
The IT company in turn will provide actual data to the State machinery after analysis, for better understanding and treatment of the pandemic.
Earlier, the Kerala government had filed a statement in the court, rejecting charges of illegality in its IT contract with a US firm for processing data related to COVID- 19 patients in the state and contended that initiation of penal action for breach would fall within the ambit of Indian IT Act.
The main demand of the opposition Congress and the BJP was to stay and cancel the agreement.
The Centre had also filed a preliminary statement in connection with the case, saying sharing of sensitive data, especially of health related information of large number of people, is to be resorted to in a very careful manner.
In his plea, petitioner Balu Gopalakrishnan had said the only concern is whether the data stored in the web server of company is safe and whether it can be used by the company for monetary gains.