Bengal govt to roll out open-air classes for primary school students

Researchers found that inattention led to hyperactivity in the students, and both together contributed to higher levels of cheating. The study was conducted by Eric Anderman, professor of educational psychology at The Ohio State University with Richard Gilman of Terrace Metrics and Xingfeiyue Liu, a doctoral student, and Seung Yon Ha, a postdoctoral scholar, both in education at Ohio State. Their results were published in the journal ‘Psychology in the Schools’.

The issue is important because many students with attention problems don’t get an official diagnosis, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, said Anderman who is also the lead author of the study. “Students diagnosed with ADHD get a lot of support and help in school, but many other kids with attention problems fall through the cracks,” said Anderman.

“They don’t get the help they need that could help them do better in school and avoid cheating.” The researchers studied 855 adolescents from three midwestern public schools, two suburban and one rural. Data was collected twice from the students, about one year apart.

The students completed a standardized measure of inattention that asked them to rate how much they felt they had trouble paying attention to their teacher, how forgetful they were, whether they had a short attention span, and similar questions. Students’ hyperactivity was rated by their responses to questions like whether they had trouble sitting still and whether they talked over other people.

To evaluate cheating, students rated how true it would be to say they used cheat sheets when they took tests, copied answers from other students, and similar statements. The results showed that students with higher levels of inattention reported higher levels of hyperactivity, and students who were more hyperactive reported a higher rate of cheating.

Hyperactivity by itself was not linked to more cheating. “Inattention is the driver here, the issue that leads to problems in the classroom,” Anderman said.

“The student is not paying attention, so he gets out of his seat and goofs around, and when you put both together, that is a perfect setup for more cheating.” The study took into account a wide variety of other factors that have been linked to cheating, including depression, learning disabilities, gender, ethnicity, grade point average and whether students qualified for special education services — and inattention still was related to cheating.

In addition, the researchers also examined how disruptive students were in class, based on reports from their peers. That didn’t influence cheating. “Once you account for inattentiveness and hyperactivity, we found that disruptiveness wasn’t related to cheating. That is not what is driving cheating behaviors,” Anderman said.

Generally accepted rates of ADHD are between 7-9 per cent of students aged 17 and younger. Studies suggested, however, that up to three times as many students had problems with attention or hyperactivity, but either didn’t meet the criteria for the ADHD diagnosis or had never been evaluated. That doesn’t mean they don’t need help, Anderman said.

“There are so many evidence-based programs that can help these students who have problems with attention learn to self-regulate, to learn how to be a learner,” Anderman said. “If they had access to these programs, they could learn in class and they wouldn’t have to cheat. And these students are not learning partially because of attention issues they can’t help,” he said.