Advertisement
The central government earlier this month replaced the Special Protection Group (SPG) security cover given to Sonia Gandhi, her son Rahul Gandhi, daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and former prime minister Singh by the ‘Z-plus’ security of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).
Raising the issue during the Zero Hour in the House, veteran Congress MP Sharma said there was a clear evaluation of threat perceptions to the four leaders and withdrawal of SPG cover makes them vulnerable.
“It is the responsibility of the state to protect its leaders,” he said, while pointing out that the Congress-led UPA government had not disturbed security cover of former prime ministers, including that of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and also of other protectees
Related Articles
Advertisement
He further said that after withdrawal of the SPG cover to Gandhis and Singh there are concerns which are well founded.
“We would urge the government that these issues of personal safety, security and lives of our leaders have to be beyond partisan political considerations.
“Please rise above that. Review and restore (SPG security cover). That would be in national interest, otherwise intention will be questioned today, tomorrow and in the future,” Sharma said.
Defending the government’s decision to downgrade the security cover, senior BJP MP Subramanian Swamy said the decision has been taken by the Home Ministry, and moreover the threat perception to the Gandhis has disappeared with the end of the LTTE in Sri Lanka.
“Threat perceptions have always been the judgement of the Home Ministry…It has been always been a special committee in the Home Ministry which decides. If there is any question about it, one can go to court and challenge it,” he said.
BJP working president J P Nadda said no politics should be seen in the move to replace their security cover. He said the Home Ministry has a “set pattern” and “protocol” in assessing threat perceptions to leaders.