Advertisement
Special judge D E Kothalikar, presiding over matters probed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), made the observations while rejecting Teltumbde”s bail application on July 12, although the detailed order was made available on Friday. “Upon perusal of the documents, including the exchange of e¬-mails and the statements of the witnesses relied upon by the prosecution, and after cross-checking the truthfulness of the allegations made against the applicant, this court does not find that the accusations are inherently improbable or wholly unbelievable,” the court said.
“On the contrary, I have no hesitation to conclude that there is sufficient material to enable the court to reach to prima facie conclusion that the accusations made against the applicant (Teltumbde) are prima facie true,” the judge noted. The court further said there is no hitch to record prima facie satisfaction that there is material against the applicant to show his complicity in the crime. It also noted that evidence and documents submitted by the prosecution prima facie indicate that the applicant was prima facie involved in furthering activities of the banned organization. The NIA had earlier claimed that Teltumbde was an active member of CPI (Maoist) and propagated its activities. “I hold that there is prima facie ample material on record which would reveal active role and participation of the applicant,” the court said.
Among other grounds, Teltumbde’s lawyer had urged the court to consider the aspect that the probe in the crime has already been completed and an applicant is a well-qualified person. The court, however, cited a Supreme Court order and noted that the fact that that the charge¬sheet has been submitted against the applicant cannot be used in favor of the applicant, rather it would go against him. “As stated earlier, the courts considering the bail application are required to maintain a fine balance between the societal interest vis-a-vis personal liberty of the accused, by adhering to the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence.
Related Articles
Advertisement