Advertisement
Bairstow, who is a wicketkeeper-batsman, played the two Tests in Sri Lanka as a specialist batsman before being sent back home as part of England’s workload management for its players.
Bairstow will be available for the final two Tests in India but Boycott feels he should have replaced Jos Buttler as the wicket-keeper batman for the second Test and not Ben Foakes. Buttler has been rested after featuring in the first Test in Chennai and he will return to India for the tour’s limited-overs leg.
“So I get Buttler leaving India but it is poor that Bairstow is not replacing him for the second Test. It has to be because Ed Smith (chief selector) wants to see this other kid, Foakes, get a go. Smith clearly does not want Jonny playing as a keeper-batsman,” Boycott told The Telegraph.
Related Articles
Advertisement
“It seems as if England bring him in and push him out when it suits them. He must feel like a yo-yo.”
Boycott claimed the break after the Sri Lanka tour was forced on Bairstow.
“Bairstow was not exactly looking for a rest, it has been forced on him. He would have been queuing up to stay in India and take the gloves. Jonny scored runs in Sri Lanka, he is used to India after two years in the IPL and he has a proven track record,” he said.
“You would think England would welcome competition for places. It is good for the team. If Jonny came in and kept well and scored runs Buttler would realise he has to keep playing well to stay in the side.
“But no. That chance has gone and England will be weaker at a point when they should pick their best team to go 2-0 up in the series,” Boycott added.