- SC asks Centre to consider granting some kind of representation to Nirmohi Akhara in setting up of trust.
- Centre, UP govt can monitor together future actions by authorities: SC.
- Possession of disputed 2.77 acre land will remain with Central government receiver: SC
- SC dismisses plea of Nirmohi Akhara seeking control of entire disputed land.
- SC asks centre to frame scheme within 3 months and set up a trust for construction of a temple.
- SC directs allotment of alternative land to Muslims to build new mosque.
- Damage to Babri mosque was violation of law: SC.
- On the contrary, Hindus established their case that they were in possession of outer courtyard: SC.
- UP Sunni Central Waqf Board has failed to establish its case in Ayodhya dispute: SC.
- Muslims were not in possession of outer courtyard of the site: SC.
- Muslims have not adduced evidence they were in exclusive possession of dispute site: SC.
- Iron railing was set up at site in 1856-1857, it suggests Hindus kept worshipping at the site: SC.
- Despite obstruction caused in offering prayers at Mosque, evidence suggest that there was no abandonment: SC.
- Evidence suggest Muslims offered Friday prayers at mosque which indicates they have not lost possession: SC.
- Extensive nature of Hindus worshipping at outer courtyard at site has been there: SC.
- Evidence suggest Hindus were in possession of outer court yard, says SC.
- Title cannot be established on ground of faith, belief; they are kind of indicator for deciding dispute: SC.
- The existence of Sita Rasoi, Ram Chabutra and Bhandar grih are the testimony of the religious fact of the place: SC.
- Faith of Hindus that Lord Rama was born at demolished structure is undisputed: SC.
- Hindus consider this place as birthplace of lord Ram, even Muslims say this about disputed place: SC.
- ASI had not established whether temple was demolished to build the mosque.
- The underlying structure was not an Islamic structure.
- The fact that there lied a temple beneath the destroyed structure has been established by the ASI: SC.
- Babri mosque was not built on vacant land: SC.
- SC lends credence to the archeological evidence on the disputed site.
- SC says that terming the archeological evidence as merely an opinion would be a great disservice to the ASI.
- SC now refers the content of the lawsuit of devotee Gopal Singh Visharad seeking right to worship at the site.
- SC holds that Nirmohi Akhara’s suit is barred by limitation, not a Shebait or devotee of deity Ram Lalla.
- SC says that the disputed land was the government land in the revenue records.
- Shia Waqf board’s claim was over the disputed structure which is dismissed by SC.
- SC dismisses the appeal of Shia Waqf Board appeal, pronounces a unanimous verdict in the case.
Advertisement