Advertisement
State Forest Minister A K Saseendran said that while courts could act only in accordance with the law, the government had to consider the public’s concerns and views.
That was one of the reasons that the Forest Department, for the first time in its history, created forest-friendly forums which held meetings at 14 centres in the state and came up with good recommendations with regard to human-animal conflicts, he said. While he denied knowledge about any alternative site for translocating Arikomban, the minister said that wherever the tusker would be moved, there would be a possibility of protests there and ”the government cannot forcibly impose its decisions on the people”.
”So we will inform the court and move forward according to its direction,” he said. The state government planned to capture Arikomban and keep it captive, as residents of Chinnakanal and neighboring panchayats close to the scenic Munnar hill station in Idukki district of the state, wanted the tusker removed from the area as it had been causing damage to property while foraging for food.
Related Articles
Advertisement
The CoE, subsequently, opted for translocation and suggested Parambikulam Tiger Reserve as the ideal location and the court agreed with it. However, this led to people close to the tiger reserve protesting against translocating the tusker there too.