Advertisement
The agency has made the allegation in a charge sheet filed by it against five former police officers for allegedly implicating Narayanan and five others, including two Maldivian women, in the espionage case.
In the charge sheet, which was filed in the last week of June but became public on Wednesday, the CBI said that the then special branch officer S Vijayan, who retired as an SP, took away the travel documents and air tickets of Maldivian national Mariyam Rasheeda, preventing her from leaving the country, as she spurned his advances.
The agency further said that Vijayan then found out that she was in contact with an ISRO scientist – D Shasikumaran – and based on that a surveillance was mounted on Rasheeda and her Maldivian friend Fauzia Hasan.
Related Articles
Advertisement
Thereafter, Rasheeda was arrested under the Foreigners Act for overstaying in the country without a valid visa with the knowledge of the then Commissioner of Police, Thiruvananthapuram and then SIB Deputy Director, the CBI said.
When Rasheeda’s custody under the Foreigners Act was about to expire, on the basis of a false report submitted by Vijayan, she and Hasan were implicated in a case under the Official Secrets Act and their custody was handed over to an SIT formed to probe the espionage issue, the CBI said in its charge sheet.
Subsequently, the SIT arrested four ISRO scientists including Narayanan, the CBI added.
In the charge sheet, the CBI has said that its probe revealed that the espionage case was an “abuse of law right from the initial stage” when Maldivian national Mariyam Rasheeda was detained illegally and framed for overstaying in the country for allegedly spurning the advances of Vijayan.
“To sustain the initial wrongs, another case of serious nature was launched with false interrogation reports against the victims (including Narayanan and others),” the agency has said in its final report recommending the prosecution of former DGPs R B Sreekumar and Siby Mathews, former SPs S Vijayan and K K Joshua and ex-intelligence officer P S Jayaprakash.
The agency has charged them under various provisions of the IPC including sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 342 (wrongful confinement), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 330 (voluntarily causing hurt to extract a confession), 167 (public servant framing an incorrect document), 193 (giving false evidence), 354 (outrage modesty of a woman).
The agency, however, did not recommend prosecution of the other 13 accused, including then Kerala police and IB officers, in the case as no evidence was available against them.
Reacting to the development, Narayanan on Wednesday said that as an individual he was not concerned whether the charge-sheeted former police and IB officers were punished or not as his role in the matter was over.
“They have already been punished. They are already suffering. I have no desire that they should go to jail. I do not even expect an apology from them. I would have been happy if they just said that they had made a mistake,” Narayanan told reporters.
The scientist said that his innocence was revealed in 1996 and since then he fought a legal battle for 20 years to find out who was behind the conspiracy to frame him.
“I have proved my innocence. My work is over,” he said.
The case regarding the conspiracy to frame Narayanan was registered in 2021 on the Supreme Court’s directions.
On April 15, 2021, the apex court had ordered that the report of a high-level committee on the role of erring police officials in the 1994 espionage case involving ISRO scientist Narayanan be given to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The Kerala police had registered two cases in October 1994 after Maldivian national Mariyam Rasheeda was arrested in Thiruvananthapuram for allegedly obtaining secret drawings of ISRO rocket engines to sell to Pakistan.
Narayanan, the then director of the cryogenic project at the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), was arrested along with the then ISRO deputy director D Sasikumaran and Fousiya Hasan, a Maldivian friend of Rasheeda.
The CBI probe had found the allegations to be false.
Terming the police action against the former ISRO scientist “psychopathological treatment,” the apex court had, in September 2018, stated that his “liberty and dignity,” basic to his human rights, were jeopardised as he was taken into custody and, despite all the glory of the past, was eventually compelled to face “cynical abhorrence.”
The apex court had also awarded a compensation of Rs 50 lakh to Narayanan as compensation for wrongful imprisonment, malicious prosecution and humiliation suffered by him.