Advertisement
The order was passed on February 21 and a copy of it was made available on Saturday. In her order, Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (for POCSO cases) Kavita D Shirbhate noted that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused. Special Public Prosecutor S B More told the court that the accused sexually assaulted the Class 4 student in January 2017. A teacher at the school had noticed changes in the victim’s behaviour and that she was bleeding.
Upon enquiry, the victim in sign language had informed the teacher about the offence following which a case was registered against the accused under provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, and Sections 354-B (assault or use of criminal force to any woman or abetting such act with the intention of disrobing or compelling her to be naked) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Advocate Vishal Bhanushali, appearing for the accused, contested the case and said his client was not involved in the alleged crime. In the order, the judge said the prosecution has not produced any age proof of the victim, as per provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection ) of Children Rules.
Related Articles
Advertisement