Advertisement
A single bench of Justice R N Laddha in its order of October 17 said there is nothing to indicate that the accused duo indulged in a conduct of such a “compelling or oppressive nature” leaving the husband with no viable alternative but to resort to the extreme measure of suicide.
“It prima facie appears that the applicants did not take any definitive action that directly led to the deceased’s tragic decision to end his life,” HC said.
The bench in its order noted that the provision pertaining to the abetment of suicide requires the accused person’s culpability to be more than mere speculation or conjuncture in the absence of direct inducement or incitement.
Related Articles
Advertisement
It added that the marital discord between the deceased and his wife started well before he committed suicide.
The woman and her alleged lover had moved HC seeking anticipatory bail in the case registered against them on a complaint by the deceased man’s father.
The father in his complaint claimed that his estranged daughter-in-law was involved in an extra-marital affair with a man and that he had repeatedly urged his son to divorce her due to her infidelity.
The complaint claimed that due to this, the woman’s husband suffered from emotional distress and in this turmoil he committed suicide in May 2024.
The woman and her alleged romantic partner in their pre-arrest bail plea said that they were implicated in the case. They contended that the couple had filed for divorce on mutual consent before the court as their marriage was already strained.
The husband, however, withdrew his consent to the divorce and had in May 2023 threatened to kill himself. The woman had then lodged a non-cognizable complaint against her estranged husband.