Terming that having oral sex is a less serious crime, the Allahabad High Court reduced the penalty of a POSCO accused from 10 years to 7 years.
A Special Sessions Court had sentenced that accused Sonu Kushwaha to 10 years imprisonment under the Indian Penal Code’s Sections 377 (unnatural offences) and 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), as well as Section 6 of the POCSO Act by after he was found guilty of having oral sex with a 10-year-old minor child in lieu of Rs 20.
Hearing an appeal filed by Sonu Kushwaha against the Special Sessions Court verdict, a single-judge bench of Justice Anil Kumar Ojha reduced Kushwaha’s punishment from 10 years to 7 years, observing that the crime committed by him is ‘less serious’.
The judgment said that it would not fall within the purview of either of the two sections, but it is punishable under section 4 of the POCSO Act.
Delhi HC directs police to form SIT to locate, produce missing girl as parents apprehend trafficking
Court required to separate chaff from grain in cases where evidence is partly reliable & partly unreliable: SC
HC quashes clause in Chhattisgarh govt’s ad providing 100 pc quota for women in nursing college posts
K'taka HC seeks response from Karnataka forest dept on speeding trains in Western Ghats region
“It is clear that offence committed by appellant neither falls under Section 5/6 of POCSO Act nor under Section 9(M) of POCSO Act because there is penetrative sexual assault in the present case as the appellant has put his penis into mouth of victim. Putting penis into mouth does not fall in the category of aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault. It comes into category of penetrative sexual assault which is punishable under Section 4 of POCSO Act,” the Court observed.
The Court reduced the sentence of the appellant from 10 years of rigorous imprisonment to 7 years, and a fine of Rs 5,000, since ‘penetrative sexual assault’ under Section 4 is a “lesser offence” than ‘aggravated penetrative sexual assault’ under Section 6.
The appellant Sonu Kushwaha was accused of going to the complainant’s house and taking the complainant’s 10-year-old kid with him. “In exchange for Rs 20, he urged the child to put his penis in his mouth. When the child returned home, his family inquired as to where he obtained the money from”.
Upon being coerced that child narrated the ordeal. He said that Sonu Kushwaha had threatened him with dire consequences if he revealed the truth. The parents of the minor subsequently filed a complaint against Sonu Kushwaha.