Advertisement
According to him, holding of multi-phase elections had been justified on the ground that there would be less violence and it’s easy to control law and order situations. “(But) the (West) Bengal experience — the ongoing Assembly elections in the State are spread over eight phases — has taught us that even multi-phase elections do not prevent violence, hatred and personal attacks,” Krishnamurthy told PTI on Tuesday.
“We have been talking about (debate) simultaneous elections (in the country”, he said. “I would rather prefer simultaneous elections on one day in each State”. But Krishnamurthy also said single-phase elections may not be possible in some places but at least they have to be brought down to 2-3 phases. He recalled that the 2004 General elections were conducted — when he was the CEC — within four phases, except in Jammu and Kashmir, where it was a five-phased one. But, the time has now come to seriously examine if multi-phase elections served their purpose.
“It (multi-phase elections) does not produce results in a country of so much diversity and so much of conflicts in social conditions”, Krishnamurthy felt. “We must think of some method of reducing the number of phases — preferably a single phase of elections. But, it would require the extraordinary deployment of paramilitary forces and so on. If necessary, we have to send them in”, he said.
Related Articles
Advertisement