Advertisement
As controversy spiralled, Singhvi said it was bizarre that politics were being raised on issues such as this and clarified that he carries only one Rs 500 note when he goes to the Rajya Sabha. “I reached inside house at 1257 pm yday and house rose at 1 pm; then I sat in canteen till 130 pm with Sh Ayodhya Rami Reddy then I left parl!” he said in a post on X.
Inside the House, the issue led to a massive row.
While Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said the chairman should not have named the member without an investigation being completed, Leader of the House J P Nadda accused the opposition of showing eagerness on “some issues” while wanting to cover up other issues The currency was recovered from seat 222, which is allotted to Singhvi, during a routine anti-sabotage check on Thursday, Dhankhar said in the House.
Related Articles
Advertisement
An investigation has been ordered in accordance with practice, Dhankhar said, adding that it was not clear if the currency notes were real or fake.
“After adjournment of the House yesterday, a wad of currency notes was apparently recovered by security officials from seat no 222 presently allotted to Abhishek Manu Singhvi, elected from the state of Telangana,” he said.
“It was my duty and I’m obliged to inform the House. This is a routine anti-sabotage check which takes place,” he said.
Dhankhar added that he was expecting someone would claim the currency notes, but no one has so far.
“Does it reflect the state of the economy that people can afford to forget it,” he said.
As ruckus broke out, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju asked, “Why should there be an objection to the name being taken? Chairman has pointed out the seat number and the member who occupies that. What is the problem with that?” He said carrying bundles of notes in the House is not appropriate and agreed that there should be serious investigation into the matter.
Dhankhar added that the anti-sabotage check was done in view of the security challenges.
“I have been careful that anti-sabotage checks must be very severe because in these highly technological situations where chemicals are used, the first and foremost is security… From that perspective it was done,” he said.
According to Nadda, the matter was serious and the opposition and treasury benches should not be divided as it is an attack on the dignity of the House.
Taking a jibe at opposition members, he said, “On some issues you show eagerness, while you want to cover-up other issues.” Kharge objected and retorted, “Why is Mr Nadda saying we are trying to suppress the matter… You do that, we don’t do that.” Union Minister Piyush Goyal also said it is a serious issue. “… we don’t know what else may be found on that side,” he said.
Without taking any names, Goyal accused the opposition of stalling Parliament over ‘fake narratives”.
“We have been seeing session after session, on fake narratives, fake views… the Leader of Opposition and the leaders of the immoral alliance have stalled the House,” Goyal said in an apparent reference to the Congress demanding a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to probe bribery allegations against industrialist Gautam Adani.
“They base their narrative on foreign reports, and stall the House. Is there a conspiracy in this as well? People will have to worry about the kind of give and take that happens to forward the fake narrative,” he said.
Dhankhar then observed that while the Leader of Opposition has objected to a matter under investigation being debated, Goyal has suggested it should be made a general rule.
Nadda suggested that the House should pass a resolution saying the proceedings of the House should never be disrupted.
The Rajya Sabha then proceeded with Zero Hour.
“My total stay in the house yesterday was for three minutes and in Parliament for 30 minutes. I find it bizarre that even on such issues politics is raised. Of course there should be an enquiry as to how people can come and put anything anywhere on any seat,” Singhvi later told reporters.
He added that there should be an inquiry on how people can come and put anything anywhere on any seat. “It means that each one must have a seat where the seat itself can be locked and the key can be carried home by the member of Parliament. Because everybody can then do things on the seat and then make allegations about it,” the Congress MP and lawyer said.
“If it was not tragic and serious it would be comic. Everyone should cooperate to get to the bottom of this. And, if there is a failing on the part of security agencies, that must also be completely exposed,” Singhvi said.
Addressing reports outside Parliament, his party colleague and Lok Sabha MP Imran Masood alleged that the government was trying to distract attention from the Adani issue.
“They are talking about wads of notes to distract attention from the Adani issue. They are in government, they should conduct a probe. Abhishek Manu Singhvi is an eminent lawyer, why would he do such a petty thing,” Masood said.
“They are running away from debate on the Adani issue,” he told PTI.
Communist Party of India MP from Rajya Sabha P Santosh Kumar said he supports an investigation but taking the member’s name was unnecessary. “… it should be limited to the periphery of Rajya Sabha itself,” Kumar told PTI.
BJP Lok Sabha MP Manoj Tiwari said he was “shocked” by the incident.
“This is a temple of democracy, money being recovered from the seat of a Congress leader… It should be investigated,” Tiwari told reporters.
“You find money from their seat, and also from their homes… Where does so much black money come from needs to be investigated,” he said.