Advertisement
“This is not only based on newspaper reports, we have ourselves filed complaints. We are not asking for any enforcement of FIR. This court has laid down preventive measures,” the senior lawyer said.
”I will look into it and post before the appropriate bench immediately,” the CJI said.
Adeeb has filed a contempt plea seeking action against Haryana’s chief secretary and the director-general of police for not complying with the earlier judgment passed on Tehseen Poonawala’s plea.
Related Articles
Theatre stampede case: Court in Telangana reserves order on actor Allu Arjun's bail plea
SC: Courts in country not to entertain, pass orders on suits related to religious places
Advertisement
In 2018, the apex court issued guidelines to the Centre and states, asking them to take steps such as fast-tracking trials, victim compensation, deterrent punishment, and disciplinary action against lax law-enforcing officials.
One guideline said states shall designate a senior police officer, not below the rank of police superintendent as the nodal officer in each district. These officers will set up a task force to be assisted by one DSP-rank officer for taking measures to prevent mob violence and lynching.
The task force will gather intelligence reports on people likely to commit such crimes or who are involved in spreading hate speeches, provocative statements, and fake news, it had said.
The state governments shall immediately identify districts, sub-divisions and villages where instances of lynching and mob violence have been reported in the recent past, it had said.