Advertisement
The district court in Mapusa town had earlier framed charges against Tejpal under IPC sections 354-A (sexual harassment), 376 (rape) and 376(2)(k) (rape of a woman by a person being in the position of control or dominance over the woman), and initiated a trial last month.
The crime branch later added to the case IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint) and 342 (wrongful confinement), 376 (2) (f) (person in the position of trust or authority over women, committing rape of such women), 376 C (sexual intercourse by person in authority) and 354 (assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty).
“The detailed copy of the order, by which our petition has been dismissed, is not with us so we are not able to know on which ground it was rejected,” lawyer Pramodkumar Dubey, who represented Tejpal in the high court, told PTI.
Related Articles
Advertisement
Public prosecutor Saresh Lotlikar earlier said the trial court (district court) had come to the conclusion that a “primary case” had been made out as charges had been framed. He said the charges against the accused should not be dismissed without a trial in the case.