Advertisement
A division bench of Justices A S Oka and M S Sonak directed the government to set up the authority in Mumbai and suburban Mumbai by January 31.
The court was hearing a PIL filed by Sanjay Lakhe Patil, president of NGO ‘Marathwada Anushesh Nirmulan Aani Vikas Manch’, on the issue of drought faced by farmers in parts of the state every year due to deficient rainfall.
The petition sought direction to the government to implement the Disaster Management Act 2005 and also sought to know the measures taken by it for drought mitigation.
Related Articles
Advertisement
The bench yesterday in its order noted that while the government had earlier claimed that the District Disaster Management Authorities were constituted in all districts, it later admitted that such authorities are yet to be constituted in the districts of Mumbai and suburban Mumbai.
“It is common knowledge that Mumbai and suburban Mumbai are prone to severe significant disasters both natural and man-made. Flooding during the monsoons is a perennial disaster in respect of which no effective steps appear to have been taken under the framework of the DMA,” it said.
There were issues of collapse of dilapidated buildings, bridges and so on which were a common occurrence in the districts of Mumbai and suburban Mumbai, the bench noted.
“The population pressure is of such high density that serious measures under the DMA are an absolute imperative, if, disasters in the happening are to be tackled with some degree or seriousness under the statutory framework of DMA.
“For a period of twelve years since the DMA has entered into force, we find that there is no District Disaster Management Authority even constituted for the districts of Mumbai and suburban Mumbai,” the bench said.
On the issue of drought, the court directed the State Disaster Management Authority and the State Executive Committee to undertake the exercise of reviewing and updating the State Disaster Management Plan particularly in the matter of tackling “drought” or “drought-like” situation in the state in three months.
“We are constrained to observe that the government has done nothing but payment of some lip service to tackle the issue of drought in all seriousness by applying the statutory framework of the DMA,” the court observed.