Advertisement
However the tabloid daily which criticised India in 2013 for sending Mangalyaan to Mars overtaking China despite “millions of poor and illiterate people” said the significance of the ISRO’s new feat is “limited”. “However, the space technology race is not mainly about the number of satellites at one go. It’s fair to say the significance of this achievement is limited,” it said.
Acknowledging that the new record is a “hard-won achievement for India to reach current space technology level with a relatively small investment,” the daily said “it offers food for thought for other countries”. “India launched a lunar probe in 2008 and ranked first among Asian countries by having an unmanned rocket orbit Mars in 2013,” it said.
“Many lessons can be drawn from India. As a rising power, it has done a good job. It is ambitious but pragmatic, preferring to compare with others as an incentive to progress. India’s political and social philosophy is worth pondering,” it said. “Nonetheless, the development of a country’s space technology is determined by the size of its input. According to data released by the World Economic Forum in 2016, the US’ space budget in 2013 was USD 39.3 billion, China USD 6.1 billion, Russia USD 5.3 billion, Japan USD 3.6 billion and India USD 1.2 billion,” it said.
Related Articles
Advertisement
“India’s space technology development tends to project national image. It’s reported that India also plans to reach Venus, another programme that is suitable for media hype but lacks follow-up research,” Global Times reported. “On the whole, India’s space technology still lags behind the US’ and China’s. It has not yet formed a complete system. For instance, the engine of its rockets is not powerful enough to support large-scale space exploration. There is no Indian astronaut in space and the country’s plan to establish a space station has not started,” it said.
“India’s Achilles’ Heel is its relatively small economic scale and a weak foundation for national development. As a hierarchical society, it has both world-class elite and a largest number of poor people,” it said.