Advertisement
The Indian national, who had been arrested on March 3 last year and sentenced to death on allegations of espionage and subversive activities, had been framed on the basis of confessional statements extracted from him when he was in Pakistan’s military custody, Salve added.
As the ICJ began hearing Jadhav’s case, India argued that human rights treated as “basics” all over had been thrown to the wind by Pakistan.
We want appropriate legal representation for Jadhav, India told the UN’s main judicial body which has stayed his death sentence.
Related Articles
Advertisement
All requests for consular access to 46-year-old Jadhav had fallen on “deaf ears”, it said.
The present situation, Salve said before the court, was grave and that is why India had sought its indulgence. He described Jadhav’s trial process as “farcical” and stressed that Pakistan did not respond to Jadhav’s mother’s plea to see her son.
India is presenting its case first, followed by Pakistan later in the day. Both sides will get 90 minutes each to argue their case.
India may avail a “short extension” to present its case, the judge said in his opening remarks.
India had appealed against the death sentence on May 8 alleging violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by Pakistan. On May 9, ICJ gave Jadhav a lease of life.
India, in its appeal to the ICJ, had asserted that Jadhav was kidnapped from Iran where he was involved in business activities after retiring from the Indian Navy.
However, it denies that he has any connection with the government.
Pakistan claims to have arrested Jadhav from its restive Balochistan province.
The ICJ was last a battleground for India and Pakistan nearly 18 years ago when Islamabad sought its intervention over the shooting down of its naval aircraft.