Advertisement
The contractor, J M Swamy, had participated in a tender in 2017 for the works related to ”combined effluent treatment plant in STC, BSF campus, Yelahanka, Bengaluru, construction of sewage treatment plant of movable bed bioreactor of 350 KLD capacity including electromechanical components,” issued by the CPWD.
The agreement had a clause for arbitration in case of disputes. When a dispute arose in 2020, Swamy sought settlement of his claim. But, the CPWD rejected this. Swamy approached the Superintending Engineer but there was no reply from him. He then approached the Chief Engineer, CPWD, who also rejected his claim. Swamy then approached the Dispute Redressal Committee, which also rejected his claim in 2021. Finally an arbitrator was appointed. Swamy approached the high court with the contention that the “arbitrator appointed is a former chief engineer of CPWD and as such there is a conflict of interest.”
The judgement by the HC said, “In the facts and circumstances I’m of the opinion that the doubts on part of the petitioner are justifiable. Statutory authorities and/or governmental bodies cannot seek to appoint an Arbitrator whose independence is doubted justifiably by the contractor.”
Related Articles
Advertisement