Advertisement
Advancing its arguements, state counsel advocate Mohan V Katarki submitted before a bench presided over by Justice J M Panchal that Goa has guaranteed that there was definitely no scope for diversion of water outside the basin to Malaprabha waterway yet there was no allegation in its objection that Malaprabha was a surplus river.
The Karnataka government additionally battled that there was no express claim by Goa in its objection that its advantages or that of its occupants would be influenced by the acts of the state.
The Goa government had questioned the Karnataka government building enormous reservoirs in the basin of Malaprabha and Kali Rivers, beyond its own prerequisites. Karnataka looked for diversion of more than 7 tmcft of water from Mahadayi basin to Malaprabha basin on the ground that river water going to ocean is wastage. Meanwhile it pulled back a hatred plea against the Karnataka government.
Related Articles
Advertisement
The Karnataka government additionally presented that the way of planning, feasibility of a project, yield at the project site, and selection of resources can’t be the topic of settling and fell outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.
A riparian state, out of its impartial offer in the waters of a inter-state river, has a self-governance under the Constitution to design its water resources as it considered fit, the Karnataka government contended.