Advertisement
New Delhi: The sedition law cannot be used to “quieten the disquiet under the pretence of muzzling miscreants”, a court in Delhi said while granting bail to two men accused of posting fake videos on Facebook on the farmer protests.
Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana, while granting bail to Devi Lal Burdak and Swaroop Ram, who were arrested earlier this month for alleged sedition, said the use of Section 124 A (sedition) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a “seriously debatable issue” in the case before it.
The court said the law of sedition was a powerful tool in the hands of the state to maintain peace and order in society.
Related Articles
Advertisement
“In my considered opinion, on a plain reading of the tagline attributed to the accused, invocation of Section 124 A IPC is a seriously debatable issue,” the judge said.
According to the police, Burdak posted a fake video on his Facebook page with the tagline – “There is a rebellion in Delhi Police and around 200 police officials have given mass resignation.”
However, the video was about another incident where some Home Guard personnel in khaki were protesting in Jharkhand, the police said.
The second accused, Ram, shared a separate video with a similar tagline. However, the video was about a senior Delhi Police officer briefing personnel at the farmers’ protest site and asking policemen to tackle the situation properly, the police said.
“I have personally seen the video in the court room wherein evidently a senior police officer of Delhi Police is raising slogans, in a very agitated tone, and a group of Delhi Police personnel are seen standing beside him. The background voices also suggest a very charged up atmosphere. It was informed by the investigating officer that the accused were not the author of the said post and they had merely forwarded it,” the judge said.
The court then granted bail to both the accused and told them to join investigation whenever called by the police.