Advertisement
A bench of Chief Justice S Manikumar and Justice Shaji P Chaly said the single judge was earlier ”right” in declining to interfere with the Centre’s January 31 decision to ban the telecast of Media One.
The court said it went through the files, placed before it by the Ministry of Home Affairs, and found that about the application for uplinking and downlinking permissions for ‘Media One Life’ and ‘Media One Global’, ”certain aspects relating to the security of the state are mentioned to the effect that Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd has some linkages with certain undesirable forces, which is stated to be a security threat”.
Likewise, about the application for the renewal of the uplinking and downlinking of Media One news channel also the court found that ”there are certain serious adverse reports by the Intelligence Bureau against Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd and its Managing Director”.
Related Articles
Advertisement
”Since it is a confidential and sensitive file maintained by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Union of India, we are not expressing anything further in the interest of national security, public order and other aspects concerning the administration of the nation,” the bench said.
It further said that even though too many details are not available in the files produced before it, it was of the view that there are certain aspects affecting the public order or the security of the State.
”Taking into account the above vital aspects, including the contents of the confidential files produced before us, we are of the view that the single judge was right in declining interference with the order passed by the Union Government refusing renewal of uplinking and downlinking permission to Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited for telecast operations through ‘Media One TV’,” the bench said.
With the above findings, the court dismissed the appeals by Madhyamam, some of its employees — including its Editor — and the Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ) against the Centre’s decision and the single judge’s order of February 8.
Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd, which operates Media One, had claimed in its appeal that it has been ”victimized” for fair and genuine news reporting.
It had contended that the reason — of threat to national security — cited by the Centre to justify the ban, was only a ”ruse” and ”without any basis”.
It had also argued that no fresh security clearance was required under the relevant provisions of the uplinking and downlinking guidelines for renewal of license.
Senior advocate Jaju Babu, who represented the channel’s editor, other employees, and KUWJ, had argued before the court that the ban on the channel was imposed without hearing it first as is required under the relevant rules.
Babu had also contended before the bench that freedom of the press, freedom of speech and expression, and the right to livelihood, provided under the Constitution, have been violated by the Centre’s decision of January 31.
The Centre, represented by Assistant Solicitor General Manu S, had argued that where national security was concerned, reasons for denial of security clearance need not be provided and principles of natural justice — like giving a hearing — do not apply.
It had also told the bench that as per the uplinking and downlinking guidelines, security clearance was mandatory even for the renewal of the license.
The single judge, in the February 8 order, had said the denial of security clearance to Media One by the MHA was ”justified” based on the inputs received from intelligence agencies.
The court had also said that according to the downlinking guidelines, even at the time of considering the renewal of permission, security clearance was mandatory.
The bench agreed with the findings of the single judge and the stand taken by the Centre in the matter.
This was not the first time the channel has faced such a bar on its operation.
Media One, along with another Malayalam news channel, Asianet, was briefly suspended for 48 hours over their coverage of communal violence in Delhi in 2020, with the official orders saying they covered the violence in a manner that ”highlighted the attack on places of worship and siding towards a particular community”. The Union Government had on January 31 this year barred the telecast of the Malayalam news channel, citing ”security reasons.”