Advertisement
Taking note of the allegations of paper leak and other malpractices, a vacation bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah said, “It is not that simple that because what you have done is sacrosanct. Sanctity has been affected, so we need answers.” The top court, however, refused to stay the counselling of successful candidates for admissions to MBBS, BDS and other courses.
Besides the Centre and the NTA, which conducts NEET-UG, the bench also issued notices to the Bihar government. There were allegations of malpractice in the exam in the state.
“How much time do you want? Immediately on the re-opening? Otherwise, the counselling will start,” the bench said.
Related Articles
Advertisement
NEET-UG, 2024, was held on May 5 and results were declared on June 4. It was expected to be declared on June 14.
The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) examination is conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA) for admissions to MBBS, BDS and AYUSH and other related courses in government and private institutions across the country.
“Issue notice. In the meantime, the response will be filed by the National Testing Agency,” the bench said.
It, however, did not agree to the submission of lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, appearing for the students, that the counselling of students be stayed in the meantime. “Let the counselling start, we are not stopping the counselling… We will not stop the counselling. If you argue further, we will dismiss this,” the bench said.
The apex court bench took note of submissions that the fresh plea be tagged along with the earlier similar petition on which a bench headed by CJI DY Chanrdarchud had issued notices to the Centre and the NTA on May 17 and that plea was already listed on July 8.
It allowed the submissions.
The fresh plea alleged that NEET-UG, 2024, was riddled with malpractices as various instances of alleged paper leaks have come to the knowledge of the petitioners.
The alleged leak was violative of Article 14 (right to equality) under the Constitution as it gave an undue advantage to some candidates over others who chose to attempt the examination in a fair manner, it said.
Shivangi Mishra and others had filed the plea on June 1 before the declaration of the NEET-UG results. After the declaration of the results, a few more petitions have been filed in the top court against the NTA’s decision to award grace marks to several candidates. Those pleas are yet to be listed for hearing.
On May 17, the CJI-led bench refused to grant a stay on the results of the NEET-UG 2024. It, however, had agreed to issue notice on the plea for re-examination.
Similar petitions are pending in different high courts as well.
One of the petitions before the Supreme Court has specifically referred to the allegations that the paper was leaked in Patna and wrong question papers were given to candidates in Rajasthan. News reports also state that an extraordinarily large number of candidates got a perfect score of 720 out of 720.